HIGHQ RESEARCH
THOMSON REUTERS
RESEARCH / DESIGN SYSTEM / PROTOTYPING
New design systems offer consistency over various brand products and significantly reduce development costs. But, if a design system is introduced to existing customers without testing or even a warning, the results can range everywhere from excitement to disappointment. Patterns we all feel make sense can feel foreign and could interrupt mission-critical work.
Recently I was involved in a project that "reskinned" a popular Thomson Reuters product in our new design system to introduce it to some key clients.
I worked with the product owners and the research team to develop a sequence of pages that would expose clients to critical pages and allow our researchers to ask questions per our goals.
GOALS
What do users think of the look from a purely subjective point of view?
Can the users locate navigation items that might have been tucked away or renamed?
Does the new design system offer better "scannability" of table-intensive data?
Does the File Viewer make sense?
OUTCOME
Users enjoyed the refreshed look and felt the application was modern and trustworthy.
Requested items located quickly with some exploration.
The user appreciated the more relaxed feel of the tables and felt it allowed them to find data quickly
Most users appreciated the change to the file viewer but requested more data be available in the right panel.